Does Taiwan support Canadian Government Corruption?
^https://rene4pm.blogspot.com/2020/10/20201010.html
10 Oct 2020
Does Taiwan support Canadian Government Corruption?
By Rene Helmerichs
Contact
via Facebook: http://m.me/rene.helmerichs
1. Taiwan's deceptive history
2. Taiwan orders psychiatrist to
decide whether prosecutors can read English
3. A catch-up: government-condoned Canadian
medical malpractice
4. Corruption of prosecutors in Taiwan (introducing Taiwan )
5.
Conclusion and personal pleas of assistance
6. Postscript: Canada 's legal problem
1. Taiwan 's deceptive history:
Happy Ten-Ten Day!
On this day in 1945, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) agreed to end the Chinese Civil War.
On 10 Oct 1945, two
armies within
Unfortunately,
the man leading the KMT army was a dictator.
Since a dictatorship is not a democracy, the Chinese Nationalist party
continued to rule
After the
rightwing Chinese Nationalists fled to
Currently in
The KMT party
remained a dictatorship on
To this day, the
Chinese Nationalist KMT party in
As the current
In celebration
of Double-Ten Day,
2. Taiwan orders psychiatrist to
decide whether prosecutors can read English:
There is an
ongoing dispute between the islands of
There is an
interesting twist developing: the use of psychiatrists in courts of law. A submission to the Office Of The President
of Taiwan reveals
In summary, the 12 Oct 2020 submission
notifies the Taiwan Government that the Tainan City
District Court is using psychiatrists to determine whether prosecutors can
accurately read English! That's just the
tip of the ice-berg.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EVONSQtMR_t2_CTKbIgdp6ELf0p-w_f9/view?usp=sharing
3. A catch-up: government-condoned Canadian medical malpractice:
How did we get to this point in our global sustainability-adjustment story?
In 2012,
unbeknownst to the teacher, the treasurer of a local Christian church congregation
in
The man was a college teacher with no history of mental health issues, no criminal record, not abusing his son, and not stalking the female treasurer whose company he abhorred. That is how this story began.
Canadian police
arrested the teacher after two church members, a male Community Of Christ
Minister and a female Treasurer, accused the man of serious criminal
offences. In a report dated 4 Sept 2012,
City Of
Canadian police didn't give the man a criminal trial. They arrested the teacher and dropped him off at the nearest place of psychiatric incarceration. The man wasn't allowed to return home, wasn't allowed to have a criminal trial, and wasn't allowed to call a lawyer or even notify someone to look after his son.
Psychiatrists insisted
the two church officials were telling the truth. The lead psychiatrist of the
Inside the hospital prison, psychiatrists insisted that the man suffers severe mental illness, including delusions, while the man refused to admit to the criminal allegations. Psychiatrist Chawla insisted the nursing team to refuse any supportive visitors, including the teacher's fiancée.
The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms states that every criminally accused individual deserves a right to a criminal trial. A criminal trial must occur BEFORE criminal allegations can be used against an individual in a psychiatric ward. In practice, Canadian police ignore the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and frequently do not allow individuals accused of "being of harm to others" to receive a criminal trial.
The college teacher decided to explore the subject and argued the point in court.
The Superior
Court Of Ontario, at
In total, ten Canadian medical doctors made a united stand to argue their right to determine criminal guilt without a criminal court process. Eight doctors defended the opinion of the first two. The last doctor, who wasn't a psychiatrist but simply a general practitioner, bluntly told the teacher's family "This man is not allowed to live with his son. It's bad for the son's health."
Canadian law currently allows psychiatrists to extend the incarceration of a criminal accused individual indefinitely. None of the doctors allowed the man to audio or video record any of the "psychiatric sessions", which prosecutors use to establish criminal responsibility. Psychiatrists also use the assessments to justify ongoing imprisonment independent of the court process.
A Psychiatric
Advocacy Office and general Office Of The Ombudsman are in place to support
psychiatric prisoners, but these offices due not interfere in criminal
matters. There is no criminal procedure
or criminal process in place to safeguard the rights of criminally accused
individuals in hospitals in
The Ontario
Court Of Justice refused the teacher's request to audio-record the psychiatric
assessments on 3 July 2015, case file C-14-6966 at
In court on 5 Aug 2015, Waypoint psychiatrist William Komer stated the teacher is delusional, and in need of court-ordered anti-psychotic injections, because the teacher is not fully aware of the criminal allegations against the teacher. In fact, psychiatrist William Komer and the teacher disagreed about one particular allegation, which the teacher could verify was resolved, however the psychiatrist refused to verify the paperwork. This is also proved in the Law Society submission.
The author of
these very words which you are now reading notes: I am the teacher about which
I write, and I'm still trying to redress this wrong. The Canadian teacher (I/me) fled to
4. Corruption of prosecutors in Taiwan (introducing Taiwan ):
In
The head office
of the English cram school (including 13 franchise locations of
No. 6, Lane 32, Section 2, Zhangrong Road, East District, Tainan City, Taiwan (701台南市東區長榮路二段32巷6號).
The teacher met
with the general manager of the English school, 江佩樺(Clare), and the head of the teaching department manager 徐乙彤(Denise), on 20 May 2017. He explained the situation. He specifically explained that Canadian
doctors imprisoned him in psychiatric wards for 3 years. When the school managers asked about a
criminal record, the teacher said that he will fail
Not only did the school managers
increase the salary offering, and provided better working times, but they also
removed the statutory criminal record check requirement from the teaching
contract. The teacher and school signed
a two -year teaching contract on 26 May 2017.
The case has been in court since June 2018.
When the school discovered that the
teacher advertised this story on the internet, school mangers 徐乙彤(Denise) and 黃姿瑜(Stacy), both supporting the General Manager 江佩樺(Clare), demanded a meeting. The
meeting occurred on 28 Dec 2017.
At the 28 Dec 2017 meeting, school
managers told the teacher that they did not want the school's clients learning
about the teacher's Canadian criminal and psychiatric history. The managers feared that the school would
lose revenue if clients discovered that the school intentionally evaded
The teacher (I) never agreed to deceive
anyone.
When the school insisted that the
teacher deceive clients of the school, the man reacted by asking clients if
they would help the teacher reunite with my son in
That's
correct: a major cram school in
The teacher thought he might be able to
help victims of the February 2018 earthquake in
Following an attempt to involve the
news, with a beneficial story to help Hualien earthquake victims, the teacher
paid a translation company to write a sample of the damage this story can do to
the reputation of the school. School
managers used the book as grounds to terminate the employment relationship
however the book was written two months after the teacher left the school.
The man began civil court proceedings
against the school in June 2018. Not
surprisingly, school managers gave false testimony in the
On 18 Aug 2020 the Tainan District
branch of
The school still claims that the man did
not provide a criminal record check and that the man intentionally damages the
reputation of the school. Both grounds
are false, since the school told the man not to submit the criminal record
check, and the man's written statements about the school are a defence against
major corporate criminal fraud.
An earthquake happened in
Currently,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EVONSQtMR_t2_CTKbIgdp6ELf0p-w_f9/view?usp=sharing
The court sent the man to see a
psychiatrist about the truth of the defamatory statements, since a delusion is
confusion about truth. The court
scheduled the assessment on 13 Oct 2020.
Earlier, the Legal Aid Foundation of
Taiwan offered a lawyer: 謝菖澤 (Jason). Jason explained that the criminal process
involves three basic steps:
1. determine whether a crime occurred
2. determine whether the crime was
justified
3. if a crime occurred, and the crime is
not justified, sentence the accused.
The lawyer also informed the man that
prosecutors believe the man is trying to extort money from the school. The specific statement involves the ditransitive
English verb "buys". A
ditransitive verb is a verb accompanies two objects. If the second half of the sentence is
completely ignored, the first half could sound like extortion: "NT$250
buys me". However NT$250 is about 9
USD, and that's really not anything worthy of a criminal felony extortion
allegation. The statement is without
extortion because the second half of the statement ("1000
advertisements") indicates that the money does not buy the person, but a
product.
The allegation is particularly
intriguing because a Taiwan Criminal Court judge ordered the man to attend a
psychiatric assessment to determine whether the allegation is true. This is akin to asking the psychiatrist to
contact the print shop and verify that 1000 A5-sized advertisements cost only 9
USD.
Prosecutors insist that the man is
trying to extort (NT$250 times 1000 =) NT$250000 (about 9000 USD) from the
school, based on an incorrect Chinese translation of the polite warning. The intention of the statement was simply: "It
is inexpensive to print advertisements in
Mental illness is different from a
physical handicap because it invariably involves a delusion about reality. The psychiatrist is supposed to assess
whether or not the man suffers from delusion.
The man was not demanding money from the
school. How the prosecutors arrived at
the amount of 250,000 NT is beyond understanding.
Lawyer 謝菖澤 (Jason) informed the man that the court cannot lawfully order a
psychiatric assessment of criminal responsibility until the court determined
whether a crime occurred. On 28 Sept
2020, lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆) informed the man that the
court has not completed a criminal investigation.
There's also an ongoing issue with
communication. Lawyers in
The man asked his government-appointed lawyer
to submit a letter to the court explaining how the prosecutors are intentionally
ignoring the fact that the school is committing criminal fraud. The man has waited two years to have the
truth of the defamatory statements investigated. If the statements are true, then they are not
criminal but a legitimate defence against ongoing crimes against the man.
5. Conclusion and personal pleas of assistance:
The
court previously told me that all submissions to court in
Would you believe the lawyer told the
teacher that, since the man (me/I) wrote the letter, that I should submit it to
the court? Scott Lin (林泓帆) replied, in Chinese, on 7 Oct 2020,
that he's unwilling to submit the letter.
The letter is in English. It's
included in the 12 Oct 2020 submission:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EVONSQtMR_t2_CTKbIgdp6ELf0p-w_f9/view?usp=sharing
Here's a copy of the 25 Sept 2019
Taiwan Criminal Court indictment against me (it began in 2018). It's all in Chinese. I can't read Chinese. Maybe in a few years Google's legalese will
be good enough:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IxoMHIRBDcCyObAWLkCgJrrTAtuZ7vQR/view?usp=sharing
Since the court isn't willing to help me
translate my defence, and the lawyer isn't willing to submit my defence, and
the Legal Aid Foundation refused to provide translation services, we can
understand why the court would want a psychiatrist to verify whether or not
prosecutors are able to read English accurately.
Since a psychiatrist is not qualified to
determine whether or not a statement is criminally false, the psychiatrist is
actually not qualified to conduct the assessment until after the court provides
a criminal investigation report. My wife
did help me to translate the truth of each allegedly false statement. I submitted proof of the truth of my
statements to the court on 29 April 2020.
Reference case file (108年度易字第1170號) in the Tainan District Criminal Court:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16r9SqfJRPulUSJ3dtaflkuEkGw7rLDoS/view?usp=sharing
Proof of each alleged defamatory
statements is included (in the large PDF) to verify that the statements are not
criminal since they are part of an ongoing self-defence against corporate
fraud. I'm still trying to restore my
reputation in
Rene
Helmerichs
updated
27 Oct 2020
previous
10 Oct 2020 (contact for copy)
Contact
via Facebook: http://m.me/rene.helmerichs
6.
Canada 's legal problem:
I did trace the root of the Canadian legal problem: the problem of permitting psychiatrists (not trained legal professionals) procedure exception from the due criminal court process. The problem is an utter lack of legal definition of the word "mind".
The term
"mental disorder" is defined in section to of
Psychiatrists assume the word "mind" means "brain", however religions all over the world insist that the "mind" of "God" is eternal. "Eternal" means always shared and always available. If God exists, and God has a mind, then God's mind is our mind, and our mind is not our brain. If our mind is not our brain, then our thinking processes can continue after death and reincarnation is a fact (as well as ghosts, spirits, psychic phenomena, etc).
Currently, the
Canadian government has an agreement with the Catholic Church to implement
religious education in