The 2021 Plan Helping Taiwan
https://rene4pm.blogspot.com/2020/08/the2021plan.html
last
updated: 31 Aug 2020
©
Rene Helmerichs 2020
Facebook
messenger: http://m.me/rene.helmerichs
(x)
This page is a draft. Like all things,
its purpose is to become more decent. View as PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/164dfTCmR9plZcurC4fcPvR2sUm72tlzY/view?usp=sharing
The
2021 Plan Helping Taiwan avoids a military confrontation with
Draft
Letter to Churches,
to ensure global freedom of religion (harmless creative expression):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1thOFU33NQLpSFun4hv6NJ1Tyw-u_ws43/view?usp=sharing
The
Plan helping
A. Brief history of China-Taiwan
B. Global Unification Plan
C. Macro-macro Perspective
D. Plan's Origin: the Canadian start
E. The story continues in
F. Solving confusion: eternal socialism?
G. End-notes
A.
Brief history of China-Taiwan
Since 1927, the Republic Of China (ROC)
government controlled all of
During
the Second World War, the CCP and KMT made a temporary truce to defend
In 1946, both the CCP and KMT were part of the
same Republic Of China (ROC), and the ROC ruled all of
The 1947 ROC Constitution declared
The CCP continued to resist KMT
dictatorship. On 2 Oct 1949, Mao Zedong
(leader of the CCP army in 1949) renamed the ROC the People's Republic Of
In December 1949, Chiang Kai-shek (leader
of the KMT army) fled to
About 30 years ago, in 1987, the KMT
allowed a second political party to form and
The question is: who owns
The answer doesn't really matter to this
2021 Plan. Logically speaking, one can
argue: because the KMT fled from mainland
- Understand
expectations religious organizations have with respect to registered
ideals and absolve of international conflict, with the West as much as the
East (applies equally).
- Explain the
Taiwan-China political situation and
- Christian churches
are registered business entities, usually as charitable
corporations. Each country
approves the operating principles of registered business. The cooperation, in turn, passes its
own bylaws to ensure cooperation with high (beyond-country) goals, but
the country must approve the bylaws.
- Expectation leads to
disappointment and upset, but also reveals willingness and ability to work
together. Understanding an
organization's expectations, generally described in the Articles Of
Incorporation, allows individuals to understand organizations.
- Design a not religious
educational non-government organization, NGO. All legally registered non-for-profit
businesses are incorporated NGOs.
The NGO reconciles the idea of an eternal mind (the idea behind
every major religion) and a thinking brain (the idea behind psychiatry).
- The NGO's purpose is
to build an international knowledge-sharing hub, a
- This plan includes a
legal argument able to entice the Canadian government into agreement, with
enough advertising support from
- The governing
structure of the city is pure socialism.
Worldwide governments are expected to carefully monitory the
self-governing state which is designed as an ultimately "proof of
concept" that a heavenly co-existence, without special regard of
money, can exist on earth.
- The NGO's purpose in
- Register the NGO -- it
takes 30 people to do this in
- Advertise the NGO in
- Apply to international
Foundations and philanthropists to help fund the employee and overhead
costs of the
Your
choice matters because cooperation is the way of miracles, and miracles
collapse the need of time. Miracles are
forever independent of religion and churches.
Globally
and individually, each person retains a unique concept of God. This causes confusion. Since a true concept of God must include
everything, everyone, and be without limit, God must be eternal. The idea that "God is country" is
not wrong. "Not
wrong" doesn't mean "not right" because not implies change.
If
God is eternal, if eternity exists, then constancy originated sentience. Thereafter, in the cosmic instance before
time, sentience begat consciousness. Conscious is the ability to communicate, and
the ability to question "Is this all I am?"
At
this point, the "big bang" would have happened, if it happened, because
quantum physics suggests the universe didn't explode "outward" but
rather "appeared" from everywhere all at once, like a fuzzy digital picture
becoming clearer. Multi-space "qubits" are the non-physical
physics versions of pixels. Qubits work
like ever-subdividing pixels into finer and finer real-life expression.
The
universe of time and change (as we know it) followed the shift into self-awareness,
to explore every possible concept of "I am".
Eternity
must be everywhere and nowhere, being without limit. "Coming from nowhere" and
"being with nowhere" are different.
"Coming from nowhere" means "not able to change". The ability to change must come from a common
and limitless (i.e. real but changeless) state in order to retain cohesion and
the ability of order.
The
paradox is how changelessness can produce change. The answer is simple: perception is according
to one's latent wishes, questions, desires but the ability never ceases.
If
God is not country, then country came from nowhere, and the process originating
country, the universe, cannot allow molecules to move. Movement only means a message is being
communicated, not what that message is.
Nowhere and nothing cannot foster meaning, because they represent an
origin in opposition to the ability to communicate. They bear the imaginary mark of eternal
confusion.
Since
the universe is always changing, and "always" earmarks eternity,
"Country" is eternally a real-time expression of the universe. The changing process of the country shares
the common ability to communicate.
In
effect, "God is country" is a better statement than "I have to
do rituals to find God in a secret somewhere" because country is one's
environment, and how one treats one's environment is a direct reflection of
what one thinks of one's creative ability.
Arguably,
one should desire to make one's country the best country in the world. Legal consistency dictates the path to global
sustainability.
In
the world, laws must be consistent. The
reason laws work is because they strive to attain a constant foundation, and
constancy never ends. If something
doesn't end, then the end is forever starting.
Laws change to become more consistent as perspective becomes more
encompassing.
In
the end, we have to acknowledge every other person as an expression of our very
own mind, an eternal sentience, not alterable with forced medical
treatment. The Global Unification Plan
is proposal to mitigate ongoing West-East conflict and ensure our own common
survival.
D. Plan's Origin: the Canadian start
The idea is very simple. The goal is to unite the world.
The
process is getting everyone to act on the underlying agreement. At times, microscopic perspectives obscure a
macroscopic outlook.
It
began with two minds who agreed to build an impossible university in Western
Canada, a knowledge-sharing hub not under the exclusive jurisdiction of any one
country's government but established according to international principle:
"not possible" becomes "not impossible" then "extremely
challenging" until finally "it just takes time" and "a
hobby takes all the time it can get".
Agreement collapses need of time.
The
project effectively creates a new country, one that exists as physical antonym,
but not in actual opposition, to the hierarchy of The World Bank. A city-state like the
A
letter postmarked 5 May 2012 to The Canadian Charities Directorate earmarks the
goal to extend and include more people. Thereafter,
officials of
The
argument began on 3 Sept 2012 in
Two
psychiatrists, Dr. Liaqat Ali and Dr. Anjana Chawla, kept a college teacher imprisoned
on presumption of criminal guilt. A
local church minister claimed three mosquito bites on the neck of the man's son
might be child abuse. A treasurer of the
church accused the teacher of unwanted communication. Local police suggested the man might be
making bombs. On paper, the teacher appeared
to be a lunatic.
The
teacher had no criminal history and no history, not personal or family, of
mental health issues. He was 35 years
old. The allegations of child abuse and stalking
were false. Inside the insane asylum,
the teacher met others whom police arrested on presumption of criminal guilt,
but who never received a trial.
Psychiatrists
immediately prescribed pills. No prisoner
of the psychiatric ward was allowed to refute any criminal accusation. Psychiatrists never gave a trial to determine
criminal guilt. Arguing with
psychiatrists was proof enough of delusion.
Psychiatrists continually introduced (tested) the newest medications. If patients didn't swallow pills,
psychiatrists declared the patient incompetent and used forced injections. A repeated objection became Oppositional
Defiant Disorder. Psychiatrist Anjana
Chawla declared the man to suffer from Delusional Disorder because he would not
admit to his crimes in the face of false hearsay evidence.
A
true concept, by definition, does not change.
Psychiatrists presume the patient is deluded to explain any "unusual"
thinking, such as trying to explain to the psychiatrist that the ability of
memory bridges time and therefore must originate from some part of self that is
not confined to linear time.
Psychiatrists insist that the brain thinks, and not a quantum mind or
eternal spirit because physical medication can only affect the physical part of
self. Because the body is always
changing, renewing its self-concept, it is not true and therefore a delusion,
but psychiatrists also insist that the psychiatrist is always right: "trust
the doctor." The man witnessed no
counselling to logically debunk any delusion.
If he laughed at the ridiculous proposition of a thinking brain, psychiatrists
noted "laughter" and recorded "hysteria" in support of more
pills.
This
example of a delusional psychiatrist comes from an excerpt of the 26 October
2012 psychiatric session between
AC: Ok, so anyone can be Prime
Minister
RH: Yes, but how many of us actually
make a plan?
AC: Right, anybody can be and anybody
can make plans but you made a comment that, "I want to be king of
RH: I didn't make a comment that I
wanted to be king of
AC: It's documented
RH: Then correct the
documentation. I have never at any point
said "king of
AC: What would you do as King? What would be a responsibility?
RH: Ah God, it's symbolic.
AC: Is it? Ok.
RH: That's what the internet is.
AC: In the hearing [on 22 Oct 2012] you
told me something to do with the churches, so that you can unite the churches--[the
psychiatrist suggested incorrect thinking.]
RH: No.
AC: --and correct the misperceptions....
That's what you said at the hearing.
RH: No. You cannot force unity, at all. The unity can't be gotten at by any one
person dictating as in a dictatorship.
If you are perceiving my dream, of whatever you want to call it as a
title, as being anything remotely of the form of being a dictator--is
incorrect. The only way you can unite something
is by pointing out the silliness of being separate. And so if two churches are arguing about
"One God" then let's talk to them about what they're arguing about
God about, see if we can't correct those so that they work with each other so
that we finally have--there's a pact between the five major Christian churches,
or four major Christian churches at the Catholic Church--form a pact like that
with all the churches don't leave out the Jehovah Witnesses or the Community of
Christ people or the Mormons.
AC: So you would achieve that how?
RH: That part is a DREAM.
AC: But how would you achieve
that? By being King?
RH: King of the Internet is something
I would be well known by, which I would need to be if I was to become Prime
Minister.
fyi, this complete answer to AC's
question was given to hospital prison staff earlier:
The Canadian public votes a new Prime
Minister every few years, but the position is not the same as a president or boss.
AC: And what about the circumstances
that brought you to the hospital, where you offered marijuana to the police and
asked to be arrested. Explain that.
RH: I will. I never at any point offered marijuana to the
police. I DID ask to be arrested and the
police officer said "Ok." ...you're
arrested for possession." And I
said "Great, let's go."
...
RH: So my Mum has diagnosed me with a
disorder?
AC: No. She gave us symptoms; I diagnosed--the doctor
before me, Dr. Liaqat Ali diagnosed
RH: Dr. Ali has also gone on record to
lie about me. He was telling the jury (at
the first hearing) that I was telling people that they could fly by flapping
their arms. How is that? At what point would I say that? I am a commercial pilot.
AC: Have you ever flown?
RH: I have a commercial pilot's
license.
AC: You have training?
RH: I have a commercial pilot's
licence--
AC: Which comes out of training,
right? You didn't print it off the
internet did you?
RH: No. I went to school for it.
AC: Right, Ok. We're going off topic. So, I want to discuss the plan. This is my plan. If you take your injection, after you take
your injection we'll all sit down--I would like to speak to your mum first and
then we'll all sit down, you'll be given a weekend pass and if the weekend is
uneventful then Monday you go home. To
be followed, as an outpatient, by me--so that's another thing that's in the mix. If by Friday the CTO [Community Treatment
Order] is not in place then you don't go home.
As a result of the CTO, if you don't take your medication or you don't
follow up, if there are any concerns, you don't have to go to emerge you will
come straight to us. That CTO allows us
to get you from the community to be admitted straight to us.
RH: I really don't want to come back
here.
AC: Right. You'll have to follow the suggestions made in
the CTO. Part of that would be to take
your medications. Part of that would be
to follow up with a psychiatrist which in this case is me, I don’t think I can
find anyone to replace me and I don't really want to.
City
Of
Earlier
in 2012, on April 21st the Community Of Christ Church held an 8-hour "Good
Sense Budget" at Grove Park Home in
On 1 Sept 2012, police detectives threatened the man with arrest, if he continues to argue the point about an all-equal God. The International Mormon Community Of Christ (not the white-shirt Mormon door-knockers, but their cousins) used the local police to threaten the man. The man spent a day and night considering the ramifications of the situation, and decided that the ensuring legal argument could help governments identify local church congregations as merely another business which is equally as liable of committing criminal fraud as Bernard Madoff (currently in jail) and Charles Pontzi (1882-1949) were.
The
college teacher approached City Of
Sergeant
Doug arrested the teacher. The sergeant
suggested the man go for a check-up at the hospital. After all, what rational person walks up to a
police officer and kindly asks to be arrested, in order to begin a public legal
argument, based entirely on principle, with an existing government?
It
was 8 a.m. on a holiday Monday morning.
The city must have been sleeping, to allow a total of four police cars
and six police officers to enjoy the joke at the over-sized
At
the end of the 26 Oct 2012 session, psychiatrist Dr. Anjana Chawla [AC], chief
psychiatrist at Barrie's Royal regional hospital, threatened to keep the
teacher incarcerated indefinitely until the teacher stops claiming that he is
not delusional. The doctor claimed that
if the man attends a hearing to challenge the doctor's opinion, the doctor
cannot end that patient's incarceration and must extent the incarceration because
the patient is being uncooperative:
RH: I do have one request. Halloween is before next weekend. My Mum doesn't want to go out trick-or-treating
with my kid. Can I do like a 2-hour pass
and just go out trick-or-treating and come back?
AC: I've given you two opportunities
and both opportunities have backfired.
RH: I've had things to do.
[Stephanie Theresa Holts was a victim
of police abuse, even previously sexually assaulted. She injected Fentanyl to cope. When police arrested her in October, they
neglected to search her. Fearing
psychiatrists, Stephanie asked for help to dispose of her Fentanyl. After 6 weeks, psychiatrists allowed the
teacher a brief outdoor trip. He passed
the paraphernalia to Lindsay, who took a picture before disposing it. The man blogged the picture, and
psychiatrists later accused the man of being a crack addict.]
AC: I know, I know. But they say, "Fool me once shame on
you; fool me twice shame on me." I'm not going to let you fool me three
times.
RH: What can I possibly do in 2 hours?
AC: I don't know; you are capable of
many things. So, what I would say is you
get your third injection, we talk to your mom, and I will see what her thoughts
are about you getting out of here.
RH: Are we having another hearing
before then?
AC: You want to?
RH: I put a request in the other day
for it.
AC: Up to you, then I will take the
opportunity--It's going to go the same way as it's gone the other three times,
Ok? Most likely. I can't say for sure. Most likely.
If that happens then I'm going to keep you here for 30 days. I mean 30 days from the time your [current]
form [term of imprisonment] expires.
RH: Well, I've already put in [the
request to start] the process to start the hearing.
AC: You can always stop it.
RH: You can always let me out for Halloween.
AC: No. That won't happen. Because I have to make sure that I'm working
in the best interests of you.
RH: So, if I go to a hearing then our
deal for next weekend is out?
AC: Ya, because the--you're showing me
that I can't trust the process we've spent the last whatever time discussing.
RH: Is that a threat?
AC: Is it? Ya, I guess, in a way, we couldn't just leave
it at that. Alright, so why don't I do
this. Hearing or no hearing I'm going to
let the form 4 lapse. [The form 4 is a
piece of paper the psychiatrist files to continue another 4 weeks of
incarceration. There was no limit on the
length of incarceration a psychiatrist could demand of a criminally accused
individual.]
AC: I'm not going to attach that form
lifting or discontinuing to anything. So
we're just going to go through the whole, whatever days it's valid for [about
25 additional days beyond 26 Oct 2012, having been started on 22 Oct 2012] and
we'll have you as our guest then. Does
that seem reasonable then?
RH: You're insane!
In
the two months of psychiatric imprisonment from 3 Sept 2012 to 30 Oct 2012, the
psychiatrist ordered all nursing staff to restrict visitors to prevent the man
from passing letters to supporters, in particular, his wife Lindsay, his
fiancee at the time.
Psychiatrist
Anjana Chawla claimed the teacher suffered a "love obsession" with
the Church treasurer based on hearsay evidence.
The man had emails from the treasurer disproving the current
allegations, but the problem was the psychiatrist. The doctor refused to believe that the man
was actually engaged to Lindsay, whom he wed in 2017 after recovery from the
psychiatric abuse. Ms. Chawla declared
the man legally incompetent in order to inject him with antipsychotic
medication, which the teacher had refused to take because he wanted a criminal
trial to address the criminal accusations.
The psychiatrist also believed the Church minister's allegation of child
abuse, based entirely on only one picture of his son with three mosquito
bites. The psychiatrist assured the
teacher that she will have the Children's Aid Society (CAS) of
On
30 Oct 2012, after two months of imprisonment on presumption of criminal guilt,
Dr. Chawla released the man. The man had
no choice. He had to accept a Community
Treatment Order, a CTO. She explained the
CTO would be renewed after 6 months, and told the man to expect to be under the
CTO at least two years. The CTO required
the man to attend the hospital every week to receive forced injections.
The
psychiatrist made it clear, all she had to do was pick up the phone and the
police would arrest the man wherever he may be and bring him back to the
hospital to receive the injections. In the recording of 26 Oct 2012 she said:
As a result of the CTO, if you don't
take your medication or you don't follow up, if there are any concerns, you
don't have to go to emerge you will come straight to us. That CTO allows us to get you from the
community to be admitted straight to us.
The
well-meaning psychiatrist increased the dosage of antipsychotic injections each
week, each week causing only more spinal pain.
The medication did nothing except solidify the teacher's resolve to end
psychiatric abuse, as this story clearly indicates. Additionally, antipsychotic medication naturally
causes the body to adopt a physical dependency (i.e. the body becomes used to
it, addicted to it). Normally, a sane
mental health protocol requires a doctor to taper a patient off an addictive
substance. It certainly does not suggest
a dosage increase unto the last injection.
The psychiatrist kept raising the dosage, knowing the injection on 22
Nov 2012 would be the last. Three weeks
after the man was released, on 22 Nov 2012, psychiatrist Anjana Chawla bribed
the man to lower a blog jeopardizing her reputation. In exchange, the psychiatrist restored the
man's right to refuse mediation. The blog
contained names of fellow patients whom Dr. Chawla abused. Among them, Stephanie Theresa Holts, born 23
July 1990, committed suicide in November 2012 after being repeatedly abused by
both psychiatrists and police officers in
The
teacher lost his job. In the middle of
his teaching contract,
From
2 March 2013 until 19 Oct 2015, the man spent the majority of his time at
Central North Correctional Center (CNCC) in
Doctor
Gunter Lorberg considered himself the chief psychiatrist at CNCC. He oversaw the 1100 inmates. He also insisted the man, whom psychiatrists Anjana
Chawla and Liaqat Ali diagnosed with Delusional Disorder, Bipolar Disorder,
Schizophrenia, Schitzo-Affective Disorder, Manic, Hysteric, and generally
"severely mentally ill" be kept separate from other inmates. As a result, he was kept locked into his cell
all day, every day, with only an average 1-hour release per week to use the
phone and shower. Three additional
psychiatrists, Van Impe, De Freitas, and Dickey joined the story alongside
Lorberg to try to declare the man not criminally responsible, legally insane.
The
man waited 16 months in solitary confinement until the court finally offered a
trial. At the trial Ontario Superior
Court trial in
Emails
from the man proved that the treasurer was lying. Unfortunately, The Criminal Code Of Canada,
alongside the official 4 Sept 2012 police report from detective Brian Read,
legally prevented the man from receiving a fair trial because the Canadian
Charter Of Rights And Freedoms, the first chapter of
After
the judge denied the man to enter psychiatric evidence as defence of
instigating the 2 March 2013 arrest, the judge found the man guilty and
sentenced the man to "time served" on 30 June 2014. Strangely, although the judge refused to
allow psychiatric evidence, the judge did allow psychiatrist Lorberg to order
the man to remain incarcerated after the judge officially released the man. So which, of the psychiatrist or the judge,
is the real authority in courts of law in
At
the time, 2012 to 2015, psychiatrist Gunter Lorberg also owned a Methadone
Clinic in
The
man spent the next year, 2015, attempting to shed light on a critical oversight
of the greater judicial system: although courtrooms and police stations
audio-record testimony, to verify the intended meaning of a statement should
dispute arise, psychiatrists are allowed to:
1)
presume criminal guilt;
2)
keep individuals indefinitely incarcerated without a criminal trial;
and,
3)
deny anyone to verify any of the psychiatrist's claims because the
psychiatrist is allowed to refuse to audio or video record interviews based
exclusively on the rational "Each patient is unique and different
psychiatrists do not want to share unique, proprietary, strategies.".
That's
exactly the same as saying that psychiatrists don't need to follow an
operational standard except to agree to always support each other's professional
diagnoses. Psychiatrist James (Jamie)
Karagianis testified to that state in court in July 2015. Details, court transcripts, and other
documents supporting this story, are the book "The Choice Amidst The
Argument In The Business Of Being Happy: a course in miracles for worldwide
peace".
The
details of
1.
Ali, Liaqat (63312);
2.
Chawla, Anjana (84905);
3.
Lorberg, Gunter Wolfgang (72223);
4.
Van Impe, Jeffrey John Howard (82520);
5.
De Freitas, Karen Denise (71381);
6.
Dickey, Robert Lee (32295);
7.
Komer, William Joseph (55555);
8.
Karagianis, James Leslie (80478);
9.
Wong, Leslie Kin Long (86592); and
10. Wozniak, Andrzej Eugeniusz
(74339).
In Chinese:
里歐凱‧阿里(63312)、安潔娜‧喬拉(84905)、甘特‧沃夫甘‧羅伯格(72223)、傑佛瑞‧約翰‧霍華德‧范‧印普(82520)、凱倫‧迪尼斯‧德‧弗雷塔斯(71381)、羅伯特‧李‧迪奇(32295)、威廉‧喬瑟夫‧康門(55555)、詹姆斯‧萊絲莉‧凱拉吉安里斯(80478)、萊絲莉‧金‧隆‧翁(86592)、安傑伊‧尤金妮絲‧沃茲尼亞克(74339)，
All
doctors except Wozniak were psychiatrists (精神科醫生). Andrew Wozniak was different. Andrew was a G.P. (General Practitioner),
originally from
- the fact that police
indefinitely imprison hundreds of people each year without a trial;
- judges allow
psychiatrists to presume criminal guilt in
- the law does not
define the word "mind" anywhere;
- something that isn't
defined can't legally be diagnosed with disorder; and,
- doctors erroneously
assume a physical substance originates health, or creative potential.
The
man claimed that mind originates thought, and exists beyond the brain so that,
after physical death, the entity retains awareness. In effect, the man merely argued the obvious
point that life must be continuous because an ever-changing reality is ALWAYS
changing, and fact of "always" establishes an unrecognized eternal
reality. For example, if one's thinking
process includes memory, which is the natural ability of mind to bridge two
different points in time, then the ability to bridge time requires also existence
in a state beyond concept of time.
The
man merely tied the concept of quantum computing, which involves existence of
qubits, non-physical particles existing outside linear time, as a natural
effect of, also, one's unrecognizable mind, which psychiatrists vehemently
insisted didn't exist because psychiatrists can't see or hear or smell or touch
it. Psychiatry is really only about
control, control over one's thinking, the erasing of freewill.
The
man's mother grew up in a culture instilling the belief that "the doctor
is always right, trust the doctor."
Dr. Wozniak put the fear of God into the man's mother, who helplessly
offered the man a plane ticket to
E.
The story continues in
A
lot has happened in
On
26 July 2019, the man submitted a 666-page official complaint to the Law
Society Of Ontario (LSO),
The
man is trying to HELP Canadians to STOP judges from allowing psychiatrists to
be judge, jury, and executioners of Canadian law. What's the point of law school if medical
doctors are let to command the law?
There
was no reply to the official submission to the LSO. The Canadian Consulate's office in
The
2021 Plan rejuvenates the original 2012 idea.
Unlike
The
government of
The
goal hasn't changed: to unite the world.
It's admittedly grandiose, but possible in just 49 days if each day we
each share the idea as a real project with one new person.
F.
Solving confusion: eternal socialism?
Think
of pure socialism like Heaven, where all is shared and no lack, want, or needs of any
kind exists. From our current situation
on Earth, pure socialism is an idea, a far-off idea, only something to
consider. The model city described in
the 2021 plan would be an example, a science-experiment on a worldwide scale,
to determine whether a purely socialist society could work. It is a voluntary agreement.
This
part gets confusing. It talks about our
mind, and eternity. Some religions ask
members to take a special shower, or eat special foods, in order to be
"accepted" into an eternal state.
Since the plan is a simple idea using the basic idea promoted by every
major religion in the world, except without the idea of specialness, this
section includes a note about "eternity".
Because
the world is always changing, and "always" means eternally, we know
only that a truly constant reality exists.
"Always" exists. We
just don't know what it is, because it's always changing. We can't be absolutely certain of anything
else. We can be certain of nothing more.
Since
eternity is limitless, only one kind of eternity can exist. That actually means the only "Hell"
is one that we make right now, but that's beside the point. Because eternity is singular by definition,
it's also constant. And this is where
there's confusion. "Constant"
doesn't mean "not changing", but it does mean always consistent.
We
can call it a "changeless" reality, but only because we're not aware
of the ever-amplification effect of goodness, which must eternally exist since
it exists in here. Goodness, kindness,
is more than a "cancelling" because it also serves to educate, to
convert, others into more acts of goodness.
Think of kindness as the ultimate computer virus.
Imagine
a cup of milk. If the milk didn't
change, it'd stay as just one cup of milk forever. To understand eternity, imagine an eternal
cup. Start with just the milk. Imagine yourself inside the milk, imagining
the milk to be contained, somehow.
Remember eternity has no limit.
Since eternity is limitless, there is no "outside". Rather, we're aware of only the milk and then
swim to the edge, looking to know the limit, to reach the container, only to
find ourselves in need of rest before continuing, endlessly, as the milk itself
is without end. The milk seems to grow
in our need of thinking ourselves to be moving it. In actuality, we can't be sure that the milk
is even moving, so we can only be certain that the size is
"changeless", which means "changelessly infinite". In the end, we can only be sure that we
exist, and that we seem to be in an ever-changing environment so consistently
as to baffle us entirely.
The
criteria of "always", in a changing reality, is to be "always
growing" and NOT "always the same", to include a universe that
is always changing. We can't be
absolutely sure that eternity is "always growing", but we can be
certain that it "isn't not" growing.
Watch the double negative there.
We
see the universe as always changing, so we know that eternity can grow, but it
remains with constant existence by definition.
So from our perspective, of the two possible assumptions--1) to be
"always the same without increase" or 2) to be "always the same
with increase"--we have to choose the assumption that includes
"limitless". If something
exists always but does not increase, then it is limited. Therefore, the universe is neither limited,
nor will it ever end, because it is literally trying to counter, or mirror, a
limitless reality in the criterion of "always" changing.
Eternity
means "has no limits", "continues forever", and
"doesn't stop or end", the "sameness" part is implied in
the first three.
A
reality that never changes is true by definition. And a reality that does not exist, well, does
not exist. Since all things in the
universe are always changing, we can be certain that a "changeless"
reality exists because change requires limits.
Our
changing universe is inside an eternal realty, that's all. And this is the tricky part. This reality is like a "dream", not
actually real. Of course it's not a
dream. Our Earth IS real, as every dream
is to the dreamer. But the dream ends
when the dreamer awakes. The dream
doesn't end of its own volition, nor does waking come through death. The dreamer sustains the dream, without
realizing the dreamer is dreaming.
As
we explore varying mindsets of believed realities, we come to know ourselves
and our eternally united wholesome mind more and more. That's our guarantee in life. In the same way, well, we have a lot of
creative potential and legal "wiggle" room.
Our
governing legal structure congeals our eternal nightmare. It strives to mirror constancy with laws that
are eternally consistent. Laws are
always changing to become more consistent.
This is happening all over our planet, even in the "rules" of
classrooms. The environment naturally
seeks its own sustainability that way.
Ultimately, there will be just one government on Earth before there is
no need of any government, if we do it right.
If we do it wrong, it'll be all out war and we'll destroy the planet,
and begin again, so that future is irrelevant.
All
futures exist, but only one is ever best at any moment in time, and that one is
always relative to any perceiver. All
perceives must share the same perception in the end, because the end, as it was
at the start, is the same eternal concept of self. There is only ONE mind, and that mind is
yours.
To
quote Edwin Schroedinger (1887-1961), Nobel Prize in Physics winner in 1933:
"The number of minds in the
universe is one."
As
thinking changes, memory changes, and behaviours change. Behaviour ultimately comes from choice,
including the choice to forgive ourselves of the thought "I don't remember
ever having a choice." This happens
over the course of lifetimes, since life is always everywhere continuous.
Life,
by definition, is already eternal since eternity exists without limits of any
kind.
The
physical process we call decay isn't life.
It's part of the process of altering perspective, like in a dream.
As
we near a singular all-encompassing goal, our tolerance of legal
inconsistencies diminishes to almost zero.
This is a natural by product of understanding what it means to have an
eternal mind. Our thinking processes
appear "not normal" to others because we are simply thinking outside
their more limited scope of imagination.
A true idea, or concept, is yet ridiculous to such individuals, who must
consider the way we live as outright impossible. To us it's just "logic". And, if we haven't mastered control over our
own reactions, errant behaviour escapes us like steam through a rear's
pressure-release valve. The smallest
triggers can produce outrageous overreactions.
The willingness of a spouse to be habitually forgiving is paramount.
This
doesn't give us permission to act like a-holes, black or white knights. If we really understood it, we'd find we have
the requirement to do to others as we would want done to ourselves, not force
or manipulate others but leave others be while they remain lost in their own
confusion. "They are not ready
because you have not figured yourself out yet." And certainly not do to others what we would
not want done to us. Always without harm
means harm always to none. The
forgiveness lesson is learning to spin the process like a plate, to never need
to think about it but simply to be always forgiving, and able to say
"No. What you're doing isn't right. Here's a better way. (So stop what you're doing or find yourself in
a Kindergarten-style time-out.)"
Then leave off, edit out, the last part because it sounds
"threatening" to the fear-plagued among us.
In
the end, tolerance to legal inconsistencies must diminish TO zero, in order to
regain the constant awareness of unity of mind, the singular mind which the
singular spirit uses to think, no longer in need of lessons beckoning more
training. In that way, every single
person on the planet right now who is collectively advocating for any part of a
common sustainability is actually sharing the same one wholey voice.
Saying
that communism is "bad" is like communists torturing religious
practitioners. It does nothing. It only demonstrates a strong conviction. Current Chinese officials believe in their
government, and they've demonstrated willingness to kill of that belief. It's not different than
It's YOUR Choice. That's what the story means. Your choice matters because cooperation is
the way of miracles, and miracles collapse the need of time. There is no God here, only you.
One
might imagine "Your choice doesn't really matter" as a correct
response from an eternal perspective.
The logic is incorrect. That's
what the phrase "Time waits on your choice" means. It means slight perspective adjustments are
needed in order to understand one's whole self as being also the ground under one's
feet.
#talk2dream #metoo #teamamandatodd
#amandatodd #georgefloyd #worldpeace #
